



JIM LONG'S PORK COMMENTARY
GENESUS is a registered trademark of Keystone Pig Advnacement Inc.
September 5, 2006
By Jim Long, Senior Vice-President Genesus Genetics
Every year for the last 16 the Carthage (Illinois) Veterinarian Clinic, which is lead by Dr. Joe Connor, has put on a one day seminar for the swine industry. Last week, we went to the conference for the first time. There were approximately 600 attendees, 57 exhibitors and about two dozen speakers. The speakers were good and the conference was well organized.
We had an opportunity at the conference to talk to several producers and industry people that we know.
Expansion – Some new sow building is going on but it is still relatively restrained. In conversations with builders and other genetic companies it appears that there are numerous quotes for new sow buildings, but little dirt has been pushed or cement poured. If construction of buildings has not started by mid October, many feel that they will not happen before spring. The next 6 weeks are key in assessing the relative speed of new sow barn construction.
The cost of new sow barn construction is pushing north of $1250 US per sow. Obviously, this is increasing breakevens and risk. One factor in the sow barn equation is the relative lack of technological advancements in barn design and construction. The new sow barns today at $1250 plus are little different than the sow barns built 10 years ago for $750 per sow. There have been no significant technological breakthroughs in gestation design, farrowing, ventilation, etc. relative to ten years ago. Consequently new sow buildings do not have an inherent productivity edge to compensate for the $500 per sow increase in building and equipment cost relative to a ten year old barn. This lack of basic building and equipment technological advancement is a factor in restricting the growth of new sow barn construction as utilization of advancements in genetics, nutrition and health can all be captured in the existing infrastructure.
At the Carthage Vet Conference there was a presentation by Mark Pennigroth and John McNutt from the accounting firm Lotta, Harris, Hanor & Pennigroth LLP of Tipton Iowa.
Their accounting practice includes 250 swine producing clients who are producing approximately 4 million hogs per year. They shared cost of production data with conference attendees. In 2005, cost of production farrow to finish for their producer group averaged 41.75 liveweight per lb. Their top 10% producers average cost was 36.96 per lb. Year to date in 2006, they characterized year to date costs as similar to 2005.
The difference between a top 10 producer was 4.79 cents per lb which on a 260 lb marked hog is $12.45 per head.
The following is some of the cost of production data presented at the conference for you to benchmark against your own operation. This from 250 swine producing farms producing 4 million hogs per year.
2005 Cost of Production Benchmark
Breed to Wean Units
Cost per Pig Produced – Complete Equivalent
Benchmark 50th Percentile |
Benchmark 90th Percentile |
|
Expenses |
||
Personnel |
5.50 |
5.00 |
Facilities |
5.50 |
5.25 |
Other Operating |
1.00 |
.90 |
Total of labor, facilities, and other costs normally borne by contracts |
12.00 |
11.15 |
Genetics |
4.63 |
3.80 |
Feed |
8.61 |
7.31 |
Veterinary/Medicine |
1.90 |
1.75 |
Total Cost of Production before administrative & finance |
27.14 |
24.01 |
Administrative |
1.50 |
1.50 |
Total Cost of Production before finance |
28.64 |
25.51 |
Interest |
.39 |
0.16 |
Total cost of production (per pig) |
29.03 |
25.67 |
2005 Comparative Cost of Production
Farrow to Finish Units
Cost per Hundred Weight
Benchmark 50th Percentile |
Benchmark 90th Percentile |
|
Expenses |
||
Personnel |
4.31 |
3.98 |
Facilities |
6.71 |
6.38 |
Other Operating |
2.20 |
1.59 |
Total of labor, facilities, and other costs normally borne by contracts |
13.22 |
11.95 |
Genetics |
1.82 |
1.49 |
Feed |
23.35 |
20.80 |
Veterinary/Medicine |
1.61 |
1.26 |
Death Loss Factor |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Total Cost of Production before administrative & finance |
40.00 |
35.50 |
Administrative |
1.21 |
1.21 |
Total Cost of Production before finance |
41.21 |
36.71 |
Interest |
.54 |
.25 |
Total Cost of Production (per cwt) |
41.75 |
36.96 |
“All organizations are perfectly aligned to get the results they get.”
Genesus was recently presented by the Canadian Swine Breeders Association with the following 2005 TOPS Awards in Canada, at their annual meeting in Gatineau, Quebec.
Highest EBV Duroc sire…………………...…..DNOR 864P
Highest EBV Duroc dam………………...….…DNOR 865P
Highest EBV Paternal Duroc boar……….…DNOR – 1214R
Highest EBV Paternal Duroc gilt……...….…DNOR – 819R
Highest EBV Landrace sire……………….…..LNOR 2841P
Genetics gains are only relevant to what it can do for your bottom line. The following is an Economic Calculation done by the Canadian Centre for Swine Improvement indicating
2005 Annual
Genetic Gain in Dollars and Cents per return
Per sow annually production
GENESUS |
Competitor A |
|
Duroc Sire Line ($) |
+ $15.50 |
- $3.30 |
Duroc Dam Line ($) |
+ $2.10 |
- $2.70 |
Landrace Sire Line ($) |
+ $7.70 |
+ $0.80 |
Landrace Dam Line ($) |
+ $13.20 |
- $3.40 |
Yorkshire Sire Line ($) |
+ $8.10 |
+ $7.60 |
Yorkshire Dam Line ($) |
+ $5.60 |
+ $4.50 |
Total Economic Gain Genetically in 2005 |
+ $52.50 |
+ $2.50 |
GENESUS advantage $50.00 in 2005 not including previous years prior to 2005 and genetic trends in years going forward.
Example: One year 2,000 sows x $50.00 = $100,000.00 Genesus advantage.
Do not fall behind – Consider Genesus Genetics to deliver ongoing profits